Contact / errors in study descriptions
The editors can check errors against the published study
What belongs in an editorial message? A study error and its source. Personal treatment questions need medical care.
The disputed words and study help explain a correction
What can you report to the editors for checking? Errors about a study, reference link, or approved use. The page name and disputed words help identify the problem. The published study helps show what actually happened. Errors in numbers, study groups, or claimed proof receive priority.
The editors' mailbox: editors@truecostpeptide.com
Corrections are checked against the studies covered by this guide. New papers need review before they can change these explanations. More papers alone cannot prove a stronger health benefit. A different patient group or safety finding may change the answer. Another theory cannot fill a gap in human testing.
A correction about a study doesn't need your private medical details.
Personal health questions require care beyond the editors’ mailbox
A study description can be checked by the editors against the publication. That includes whether the result concerned animals or treated people. They can check a cited number and claims exceeding the findings. Problems with links or words that make a page hard to read can also be reported.
Your symptoms and medicines need medical care, not an editorial reply.
A clinician can assess symptoms, blood tests, and possible treatment. The editors cannot set personal doses or help find sellers. They also cannot decide whether a substance breaches your sport's drug rules. Those questions fall outside checking a published study's description. A licensed doctor needs the full medical history for a personal assessment.
A reply isn't guaranteed for every message the editors receive. Supported errors may be corrected in a later revision. A correction needs to clarify both the finding and its limits.